Apple iPad – Do We Need A Tablet?
So with the Apple iPad having finally been confirmed, anyone and everyone has been having their say on various tech blogs and sites around the web. So what sort of reception has the supposed blockbuster device had over the past couple of hours? Have Apple blown our minds again? Or have they finally dropped the ball?
Well… I think it’s fair to say that the general consensus is that it’s not a lot more than a giant iPhone (or perhaps I should say an iPod Touch). The guys over at Engadget have been lucky enough to get a hands-on with the iPad and they describe it as ‘not light’ and ‘pretty weighty in your hand’. An extraordinary amount of readers left comments expanding on this, going on to say “The thing is really an oversized iPhone, Apple finally fails”. It certainly makes interesting reading. Such a device coming from a company that is usually so reliable when it comes to wowing us with revolutionary devices.
Other complaints follow a consistent theme too. For example, one enraged reader says “No multitasking, no flash, no buy. That simple”. Another, “no flash, no multitasking, no integrated webcam, no integrated physical keyboard, Seriously?”. It comes as a surprise to many that this device hasn’t taken the world by storm already. I believe that a lot of people feel extremely let down by this release.
Steve Jobs opened the keynote by describing it a “netbook killer”. It has also been labelled “the Kindle killer” and in terms of being an eBook reader, this thing will be held in the highest regard – would you want to go back to an Amazon Kindle 2 or Kindle DX after using one of these? I think it’s clear to everybody that the implementation of the “iBooks” is nothing short of incredible. However, for this price tag, I think people wanted a lot more.

Perhaps they got it? Being able to run the iPhone apps out of the box means it is an extremely capable touch gaming machine, although how the current games upscaled up to the iPad size will be interesting to see, however I’m sure we’ll see iPad versions of games soon. How will this affect sales of PSP’s, Nintendo DS’s, especially when you consider the price of these iPhone/iPad games compared to the £30 titles for the other handheld consoles?
When coupled with a physical keyboard, or even with the on screen keyboard being fairly good, how will this affect the sales of netbooks and laptops? Even Apple’s very own MacBook Pro? You’ve got to think that the Apple MacBook Air is dead in the water? Clearly they are designed for extremely different purposes, however with the introduction of iWork applications and such which has been regarded as a good move from Apple, could this mean people will be more reluctant to spend so much on a laptop with no 3G, no eBook reader, shorter battery life etc.
Perhaps this would be the perfect device for those people out there who don’t use computers yet? Surely, this could be a great user-friendly touch-based device for all those parents out there who haven’t wanted to learn how to use a full computer system?

Some other points that I have taken from the hands-on at Engadget are their particular references to a ’stunning’ screen. They certainly don’t hold back their praise for this device, however they are slightly critical in some departments. Although, they call the processor ’something to be marvelled at’, the machine is apparently extremely fast which is of course, an added benefit. But then, why no multitasking?
I think there are several aspects to the device which are missing. It has certainly got a lot of people’s backs up. I think most of it revolves around the fact that it is being perceived as too similar to the iPhone/iPod Touch? Is it just a giant version? Although, I’m sure some people will want that, for example if you travel a lot, having a device that can play 10hrs of videos on a flight or train journey, that would be quite an upgrade from an iPhone screen!

It’s most definitely going to be another closed Apple eco-system created for you to continually spend money on content. Also, no multi-tasking, no flash, no camera for video conferencing.
On the other hand, Steve Jobs described the pricing of the Apple iPad as a ‘miracle’. I believe this view is pretty much echoed throughout the web at the moment. The basic model being just $499, is somewhat cheap for an Apple product. Or is this just Apple conceding that anything higher just won’t sell? After all, once people have got them, they will be raking in the profits from applications and software etc.
Overall I believe that Apple have got a lot of marketing to do. A lot of promotion and publicity. The public generally, are left unconvinced and underwhelmed. I doubt it will be a flop though, I mean come on, it’s gorgeous! Plenty of people will buy a tablet device like the Apple iPad and they always will.
But what do you think? Do you *need* to get one? Or do you just *want* to get one? If you want one, do you just want the wifi version or do you need the 3G mobile internet (contract) version of the iPad?
Via – Engadget






Comments: 1
10:34 pm 27th January, 2010
No camera. No USB port. No multitasking. No folder for non-apple media. Ill have my Archos 9 this week instead of waiting 90 days. Look at the price for the 64 GB 3G model. Close enough to $1000 to say ouch. A blind iPhone on steroids. I’ll get one, but I’m not feeling the love.
Comments: 59
10:43 pm 27th January, 2010
Totally agree, although i wouldn’t be too hasty going for that archos. Although i was tempted by the thing at first i was put off by the low spec. There’s also the matter of that HP slate PC we were promised.
Comments: 110
12:55 am 28th January, 2010
Wha-wha-whaaa!
Well, they had their Vista with the buggy Snow Leopard. What’s this nonsense then, the Apple Zune!?!
Comments: 1
8:32 pm 31st January, 2010
I really like the web browsing/video capability – like you say, on long journeys it would be a total upgrade from an iPhone screen
However, (and this is going to sound old fashioned…) I’m not a big fan of touch screens! I like having buttons to press – that’s kinda why I like the Kindle and non-touch screen phones. I know iPhone folk are used to using a touch screen but when you’re sending email, making notes etc a keyboard is still way better. The iPad isn’t so great for that
Comments: 59
8:48 pm 31st January, 2010
@piggynap
I know exactly what you mean, but i have to say having used an iPhone and an iPod Touch, the touchscreen is as good as they get at the moment. it’s sensitive and accurate. I can only imagine the iPad is as good as if not better.
@Average Windows Nerd
It’s funny you mention an Apple Zune… I could have sworn i saw rumours of a ‘zune phone’ lately… i’m sorry but turning your flagship PMP into a phone is just exactly what Apple have done with the iPod touch to iPhone.
Microsoft will stick to what they do best. Take Apple ideas and make them ugly.
Comments: 110
10:04 pm 1st February, 2010
@Rob.- Is that really what you believe? Ugly?!? Well, ok then.
Apparently Balmer has flat-out denied rumours of a “Zune Phone” (thank god, let’s be honest it would be shit anyway).
I’d love to be the Windows prick you know I am, but really, that’s not where I’m coming from here.
C’mon, admit it. It’s a real lemon.
Comments: 59
11:09 pm 1st February, 2010
Let’s say this. It could be a whole lot better. But in it’s defence i think that because the iPhone is so great, Apple were wise to keep it similar. I think ‘If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it’ applies to this perfectly.
Plus i think they’re marketing is brilliant. In 6 months there will be an iPad 2 or something and they will make a huge deal of multitasking etc. it’s what they do best.
Comments: 110
11:26 pm 1st February, 2010
Fair enough. I agree about the marketing too, Steve could sell iToxic-waste if he wanted to.
Bill is boring on a train
Bill is boring, when in Spain…
Comments: 1
1:34 pm 7th February, 2010
Apple ipad. Once the 16GB are filled with ones purchases where does one keep them so as to buy more programs? How and on what will one be able to save them?
Derek
Comments: 59
1:30 pm 8th February, 2010
Well, the operating system is the same as the iPhone and iPod touch except a few modifications. When you sync your iPod/iPhone with iTunes it backs up your apps to your PC/Mac. If this is the same then you will be able to select which to put onto the iPad whilst keeping the others on your pc.
Also, when you download from the app store, it keeps a record so you can always go back and download them again for free. However, the problem with this is the loss of save data such as high scores on games and such.